Boundary fights, title disputes, lease wars, and inverse condemnation threats can stall projects and drain capital. KTL represents clients across Los Angeles County in high-stakes real property litigation.
Property litigation
Title and lease disputes
Trial advocacy
In Brief
A California real property lawsuit resolves disputes over ownership, boundaries, easements, purchase and sale contracts, commercial and residential leases, landlord-tenant obligations, or inverse condemnation and regulatory takings when applicable standards are met. Remedies may include money damages, quiet title, injunctions, specific performance when equitable requirements are satisfied, and declaratory relief. Deadlines vary by theory: written contracts often trigger four-year limitations under CCP §337, while other claims follow different periods. Lis pendens and government claim rules may apply in specialized contexts.
Los Angeles real estate values make every boundary line, easement foot, and lease clause economically significant. Mixed-use towers in Downtown, rent-controlled apartments in Koreatown, industrial conversions in the Arts District, and single-family lots from the Valley to the Palisades generate purchase disputes, landlord-tenant wars, and inverse condemnation questions when public projects affect private land.
Property litigation moves on documents: deeds, title reports, surveys, environmental reports, and lease amendments. Lis pendens recording can cloud title when used properly but exposes signers to sanctions when abused. Local rent stabilization ordinances add layers beyond state default rules.
Owners, investors, and tenants need counsel who read contracts carefully and present judge-ready equitable narratives when millions in value or use rights are at stake. Partition actions among heirs, partnership dissolutions over development sites, and tenant buyout negotiations under local rent rules each demand different procedural tools.
Title insurers, lenders, and municipalities may enter the same dispute with conflicting interests. We coordinate surveyors, appraisers, and transactional documents so courtroom strategy aligns with how the property actually functions on the ground. Whether the fight is a failed purchase in Silver Lake, a commercial lease in DTLA, or an easement across a hillside lot, early strategy on lis pendens, remedies, and limitations avoids costly procedural detours. Rent-controlled units and mixed-use redevelopment add local ordinance research that generic contract lawyers may overlook. KTL represents clients across Los Angeles County in high-stakes real property disputes and prepares cases for trial when counterparties refuse reasonable resolution.
John Torbett won a verdict that involved damage to real property and the destruction of extremely valuable personal property due to the City of Los Angeles’s negligence.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. The outcome of any case depends on the specific facts and applicable law. Verdicts and settlements listed represent the gross amount before fees, costs, and liens.
Failed closings, deposit disputes, and misrepresentation claims arise when parties disagree over contingencies, disclosures, or funding.
Fence lines, driveways, and structures crossing legal descriptions require survey and title analysis.
Shared driveways, utility easements, and view easements in hillside neighborhoods generate chronic litigation.
Commercial CAM charges, habitability, wrongful eviction, and rent-control compliance in Los Angeles add local ordinance layers.
Forged deeds, heir disputes, and lender liens cloud ownership until court resolution.
Public projects and zoning decisions may deprive property of value or use when legal standards are met.
Clouded title and injunctions prevent sale, refinance, and development timelines.
Commercial tenants lose revenue when access or use is blocked by disputes or unsafe conditions.
Structural defects and environmental issues force unplanned capital outlays.
Some property disputes involve harassment or bad-faith conduct; damages categories are claim-specific.
Purchase, sale, lease, and option agreements are interpreted under contract principles with specific performance available when equitable standards are met.
Quiet title actions establish ownership against adverse claims and liens through statutory procedures.
Many written real property contracts trigger four-year limitations; oral contracts may be shorter.
Habitability, security deposits, eviction defenses, and rent control interact with Los Angeles municipal codes.
When public conduct substantially impairs property value or use, specialized constitutional and statutory analysis applies.
Recording notice of pending litigation affects title; improper use risks sanctions.
Contract counterparties breach purchase terms, fail to disclose material facts where law requires, or wrongfully withhold deposits.
Partition and quiet title defendants include family members and investors with competing claims.
Lease disputes name both sides depending on breach theories and rent-control status.
Wrongful foreclosure and title negligence claims are fact-specific and coverage-driven.
Inverse condemnation defendants include agencies whose projects affected parcel value or use.
Construction defects and encroachment may implicate builders and design professionals.
Lost value, repair costs, lost rents, and carrying costs when causation is proved.
Courts may compel conveyance or stop harmful conduct when money damages are inadequate.
Judgments clearing title or defining rights may be primary remedies.
Recoverable only when contracts or statutes authorize; not automatic in property disputes.
Rare; require malice standards under Civ. Code §3294 when applicable.
| Claim / context | Typical starting point |
|---|---|
| Written contract | Often four years under CCP §337; confirm accrual. |
| Oral contract | Shorter period may apply; verify. |
| Fraud | May toll accrual in defined contexts; analyze with counsel. |
| Government inverse condemnation | Government claim and suit rules may apply; specialized deadlines. |
Insert firm-approved deadline chart after intake. Deadlines are fact-specific; this table is a planning aid, not legal advice.
Unclean hands, laches, and estoppel may bar relief when parties delayed unreasonably or acted inequitably.
Owners must take reasonable steps to limit losses from breach or property damage.
Most property disputes do not use auto-style fault percentages unless tort theories are pled alongside contract claims.
Coverage disputes turn on policy exclusions, endorsements, and notice requirements.
Business property policies and liability coverage may respond to third-party injury on site.
D&O and professional policies may cover certain agent conduct.
Escrow holder duties are contract-specific.
“We try cases. That is what we are built for, and it is what makes our settlement offers higher than firms that won’t see the inside of a courtroom.”
Daniel Kramer, Founding Partner

Founding Partner
Daniel Kramer is a trial lawyer who specializes in representing families and individuals involved in catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death matters, as well as employment discrimination and retaliation lawsuits.

Trial Lawyer
John Torbett is a trial lawyer whose practice focuses on general business litigation, real property litigation, insurance litigation (including bad faith), commercial landlord–tenant disputes, partnership disputes, corporate governance and control disputes, entertainment litigation, and securities litigation.
Strong documentation is often one of the most important factors in resolving a real property dispute. The most helpful evidence usually includes deeds, title records, easements, property maps, surveys, purchase agreements, inspection reports, HOA documents, leases, and communications between the parties involved. Photographs and videos can also play a major role, especially in disputes involving boundary lines, encroachments, water intrusion, property damage, nuisance conditions, or construction defects. Keeping records over time can help show how conditions developed and whether problems worsened.
Depending on the type of dispute, expert evaluations may also become important. Surveyors, engineers, contractors, environmental consultants, or geotechnical experts may help evaluate property boundaries, structural issues, drainage problems, soil movement, or other technical concerns. It is often helpful to organize records into a clear timeline showing when events occurred, when concerns were raised, and how the dispute developed. Early investigation and careful documentation can make a significant difference in protecting your property rights and strengthening your position during negotiations or litigation.
In nuisance and trespass cases, courts generally look at how the property owner was harmed and what compensation or remedy may fairly address the problem. Depending on the circumstances, damages may include the cost to repair property damage, reduced property value, cleanup expenses, and compensation for the loss of use and enjoyment of the property. For example, ongoing noise, odors, water intrusion, smoke, vibrations, drainage issues, or repeated intrusions onto property can significantly affect a person’s daily life and ability to enjoy their home.
In some situations, courts may also order injunctive relief, which means requiring the harmful conduct to stop or ordering corrective measures to prevent the problem from continuing. Evidence often includes photographs, repair estimates, expert evaluations, property appraisals, neighbor testimony, and records documenting how long the issue existed and how it affected the property owner’s quality of life. Because these disputes can become highly fact-specific, detailed documentation and expert analysis are often important in proving both liability and damages.
A partition action is a legal process used when co-owners of real property cannot agree on how the property should be managed, divided, or sold. These disputes commonly arise between family members, former partners, inherited property owners, or business co-owners. In some cases, one owner wants to sell the property while another wants to keep it, occupy it, or dispute financial contributions related to the property.
In a partition case, the court may order the property to be physically divided when possible, although many cases result in the property being sold and the proceeds divided among the owners according to their ownership interests. The court may also consider financial issues such as mortgage payments, taxes, maintenance costs, repairs, improvements, rental income, or one owner’s exclusive use of the property over time. Because partition disputes can become emotionally and financially complicated, early property valuation, accounting analysis, and settlement discussions can often help reduce conflict and move the matter toward resolution more efficiently.
California law generally requires sellers to disclose known material defects or conditions that could affect a property’s value or desirability. Disclosure disputes often arise when buyers later discover problems they believe were not properly disclosed before the sale. Common issues include water intrusion, mold, foundation problems, roof leaks, drainage issues, unpermitted construction, boundary disputes, neighborhood nuisances, or prior damage to the property.
Evidence in these cases may include disclosure forms, inspection reports, contractor records, repair invoices, emails, text messages, photographs, and expert evaluations regarding the condition of the property. In some cases, buyers may seek compensation for repair costs, reduced property value, relocation expenses, or other financial losses caused by the undisclosed condition. In more serious situations, buyers may attempt to rescind the transaction entirely. Because property conditions can change over time and evidence may disappear, prompt inspections and expert evaluations are often critical in identifying the cause and extent of the problem.
Real property disputes can become expensive and time-consuming, so focusing on practical solutions early in the process is often important. Many cases benefit from early site inspections, organized document collection, targeted discovery, and mediation after key information has been exchanged. Narrowing the dispute to the most important factual and legal issues can help reduce unnecessary conflict and legal expenses.
In technically complex cases, neutral experts or professional evaluations may help clarify issues involving boundaries, structural conditions, drainage, easements, valuations, or construction defects before litigation escalates further. Practical solutions — such as repairs, negotiated easement agreements, financial offsets, boundary adjustments, or property sales — can often resolve disputes more efficiently than prolonged litigation focused on every contested allegation. An experienced real estate attorney can help evaluate the strengths and risks of a case, preserve important evidence, and develop a strategy focused on protecting both the property owner’s legal rights and long-term interests.
These official resources are starting points, not legal advice for your specific matter.
Property disputes reward early strategy—don’t let deadlines and recordings slip.