California law requires employers to engage in a good-faith interactive process and provide reasonable accommodations unless undue hardship applies. When employers refuse, retaliate, or stereotype disability, KTL represents workers across Los Angeles County.
FEHA experience · Workplace accommodations · Trial advocacy
In Brief
A California disability discrimination case is an employment claim alleging an employer treated a worker adversely because of a physical or mental disability, medical condition, or perceived disability, or failed to provide reasonable accommodation and engage in good faith in the interactive process under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12940). Covered employers must assess accommodations unless undue hardship applies. Related federal Americans with Disabilities Act claims may parallel state remedies for qualifying employers. Remedies may include lost wages, emotional distress damages, reinstatement, and injunctive relief where appropriate. Most workers must file with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) or EEOC within strict administrative deadlines before suing in court.
Los Angeles employers range from entertainment studios and tech campuses to hospital systems, warehouses along the 710 corridor, and hospitality along the coast. Each sector applies accommodation law differently: production schedules conflict with chemotherapy appointments, warehouse piece-rate quotas clash with lifting restrictions, and return-to-office mandates collide with remote-work medical recommendations.
California’s Civil Rights Department processes disability and accommodation complaints statewide, including Los Angeles residents. Federal ADA protections may also apply to covered employers. Because LA’s workforce is large and mobile, cases often turn on email trails, HR ticketing systems, and whether decision-makers engaged in the interactive process before termination. CRD intake and right-to-sue timing can bar strong claims if you wait.
KTL represents workers across LA County when employers stereotype disability, deny accommodations without analysis, or retaliate after medical disclosures.
Mr. De Peralta, a chef, was terminated when he injured his knee outside of work.
Verdict plus Judgment awarding attorney’s fees on behalf of a low-wage garment worker who was terminated after reporting a work injury at a high end jeans company.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. The outcome of any case depends on the specific facts and applicable law. Verdicts and settlements listed represent the gross amount before fees, costs, and liens.
Employers that ignore accommodation requests or issue blanket denials without discussing alternatives may violate FEHA’s good-faith dialogue requirements.
Post-pandemic return mandates without individualized assessment of medical need are a recurring Los Angeles pattern in office and creative industries.
No-fault point systems that penalize disability-related absences can discriminate when employers fail to adjust policies reasonably.
Workstations, assistive devices, and rest breaks may be reasonable for back, vision, or repetitive-stress limitations.
Mockery of mobility aids, psychiatric treatment, or visible symptoms supports hostile-environment theories when severe or pervasive.
Termination or demotion shortly after HR complaints or FMLA/CFRA leave raises pretext and retaliation inferences.
Sudden negative reviews after years of strong ratings following disclosure of disability may signal discriminatory motive.
Termination, reduced hours, and denied promotions produce back pay and front pay issues requiring payroll and benefits documentation.
Blocked transfers and stripped accounts after accommodation requests can limit lifetime earnings in commission-driven industries.
Returning to unsafe duties without modifications may aggravate medical conditions and support damages when linked to employer conduct.
Anxiety, depression, and humiliation after public comments or forced disclosure of medical details may be compensable under FEHA when liability exists.
Disability claims often intersect with Wrongful Termination, Wage & Hour, and Age Discrimination when older workers with disabilities face stacked bias.
FEHA prohibits disability discrimination in hiring, termination, compensation, and terms of employment and requires reasonable accommodation absent undue hardship.
FEHA defines disability broadly, including physical and mental conditions that limit major life activities. Regulations on leginfo Government Code detail coverage and proof.
Employers must engage in timely, good-faith dialogue about limitations and accommodations before taking adverse action based on disability.
Employers may deny accommodations that impose undue hardship or pose a direct threat to health or safety when supported by objective evidence, not stereotypes.
The Americans with Disabilities Act parallels many FEHA protections for covered employers; strategy may include dual agency filings.
Opposition to unlawful practices and participation in proceedings are protected when statutory elements are met.
The hiring entity is usually the primary FEHA defendant for accommodation and termination decisions.
Individual liability rules differ by claim type; focus often remains on employer entities with deeper pockets.
Temp and staffing placements may involve both agency and client liability when both control work conditions.
Centralized HR policies may support Monell-like corporate liability themes in employment contexts when policies originate at the parent level.
Back pay, front pay, lost benefits, and out-of-pocket medical costs tied to denied accommodations.
Emotional distress from humiliation, anxiety, and loss of dignity when liability is established.
Courts may order return to work or policy changes when equitable remedies are feasible.
FEHA may allow reasonable fees for prevailing plaintiffs, shifting litigation incentives.
Available when employer misconduct meets malice, oppression, or fraud standards under California law.
California’s statutes of limitations are strict. Missing one is almost always fatal to a case, no matter how strong the underlying facts.
| Stage | Typical guidance |
|---|---|
| CRD intake | File promptly once counsel evaluates facts; confirm current statutory windows. |
| EEOC (if elected) | Coordinate dual filing when federal claims are pursued. |
| Right-to-Sue notice | Strict calendar from receipt; missing it bars court filing. |
| Lawsuit in LA Superior Court | Must align with FEHA limitations after administrative exhaustion. |
Replace with firm-confirmed dates for each matter. Government and union employers may have additional steps.
Employers must show specific financial or operational burdens, not mere inconvenience, before denying accommodations.
Employers may insist on qualifications genuinely required for the role if accommodations cannot enable performance.
Safety-based denials require individualized assessment supported by medical evidence, not fear or stigma.
Stated performance reasons are tested against timing, similarly situated employees without disabilities, and inconsistent documentation.
Employment Practices Liability Insurance
Many employers carry EPLI with deductibles and panel counsel that influence early mediation.
Insurers may require employer approval before funding settlements, affecting timing.
Employers often demand NDAs; evaluate whether confidentiality trades away public accountability you need.
Forced arbitration changes forum but not substantive FEHA rights in many contracts; review enforceability early.
“We try cases. That is what we are built for, and it is what makes our settlement offers higher than firms that won’t see the inside of a courtroom.”
Daniel Kramer, Founding Partner

Founding Partner
Daniel Kramer is a trial lawyer who specializes in representing families and individuals involved in catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death matters, as well as employment discrimination and retaliation lawsuits.

Partner, Trial Lawyer
Teresa is a trial lawyer and partner at Kramer Trial Lawyers practicing in the areas of plaintiff’s personal injury, wrongful death and employment litigation.
California law protects employees and job applicants from discrimination based on physical disabilities, mental health conditions, medical conditions, and perceived disabilities. Under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), employers generally cannot treat someone unfairly because of a disability or medical condition, and they are often required to provide reasonable accommodations that allow employees to perform their jobs.
Disability discrimination can take many forms. Examples may include refusing to provide reasonable accommodations, denying medical leave, demoting or terminating an employee after a diagnosis or injury, retaliating against someone for requesting accommodations, or treating an employee differently because of a medical condition or disability.
To prove a disability discrimination claim, it is often necessary to show that the employee was able to perform the essential duties of the job with or without reasonable accommodation, suffered a negative employment action, and that the disability or accommodation request played a role in the employer’s decision.
Evidence may include emails, HR communications, medical leave records, accommodation requests, performance reviews, witness statements, or comments made by supervisors or coworkers. In some cases, evidence that an employer failed to engage in the required “interactive process” to discuss accommodations can also be important.
California employees generally must first file a complaint with the Civil Rights Department before pursuing a lawsuit. Depending on the circumstances, remedies may include lost wages, emotional distress damages, accommodations, reinstatement, attorney’s fees, and other compensation allowed by law.
If you believe you are experiencing disability discrimination at work, keeping clear records can be very important. Try to document events as they happen, including requests for accommodations, medical leave discussions, disciplinary actions, changes in treatment, or conversations with supervisors and HR.
Helpful evidence may include emails, text messages, HR communications, doctor’s notes, accommodation requests, leave paperwork, performance reviews, schedules, and records of workplace policies or procedures. If your employer denied accommodations, delayed responding, or treated you differently after learning about a disability or medical condition, keep copies of any communications related to those events.
It can also help to document how other employees were treated in similar situations, especially if coworkers without disabilities were given more flexibility, support, or opportunities.
If the workplace situation caused emotional distress, anxiety, depression, or worsened a medical condition, medical or counseling records may also help show the impact the discrimination has had on your life.
Whenever possible, keep copies of important records in a secure personal location rather than only on work devices or company accounts.
Disability discrimination claims in California are subject to important deadlines and legal procedures. In most cases, employees must first file a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) before filing a lawsuit in court.
After filing a complaint, employees may request an immediate right-to-sue notice or allow the agency to investigate the claim. The best path forward depends on the facts of the case and the employee’s goals.
Disability-related claims may also involve other laws and protections, including medical leave rights, workplace accommodation requirements, retaliation protections, and family or medical leave laws. Claims involving public employers, union agreements, or arbitration clauses may involve additional rules or deadlines.
Because these deadlines can affect your legal rights, it is important to act promptly and preserve evidence early. Save accommodation requests, medical documentation, emails, personnel records, schedules, and communications related to your condition or workplace concerns.
Speaking with an experienced employment attorney early can help ensure deadlines are met and that the appropriate legal steps are taken to protect your claim.
If you were harmed by disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, or retaliation in the workplace, you may be entitled to compensation for both your financial losses and the personal impact the experience has had on your life.
Depending on the circumstances, damages may include lost wages, lost benefits, future lost earnings, and compensation for emotional distress. Employees may also seek compensation for denied accommodations, wrongful termination, or medical leave violations.
In some cases, employees may request reinstatement to their former position or workplace accommodations that were improperly denied. When an employer’s conduct is especially harmful or intentional, punitive damages may also be available under California law.
Evidence used to support damages may include medical records, pay records, employment documents, expert opinions, and evidence showing how the workplace conduct affected the employee’s health, career, and daily life.
Every case is different, and the value of a claim depends on factors such as the severity of the harm, the strength of the evidence, and the long-term effects of the discrimination.
If you believe you are experiencing disability discrimination at work, it is important to document concerns clearly and consistently. Whenever possible, communicate accommodation requests and workplace concerns in writing so there is a record of your communications.
When reporting issues to HR or management, try to include details about what happened, when it occurred, who was involved, and how the conduct affected your ability to work. Keep copies of accommodation requests, doctor’s notes, leave paperwork, and any responses from your employer.
It is also important to save performance reviews, schedules, disciplinary notices, and communications related to your job duties, medical leave, or workplace restrictions. If you experience retaliation after requesting accommodations or reporting concerns — such as reduced hours, write-ups, demotion, exclusion, or termination — document those events as well.
California law generally requires employers to engage in a good-faith interactive process when an employee requests a reasonable accommodation. Careful documentation can help establish whether an employer met those obligations and can preserve important evidence if legal action later becomes necessary.
These official resources are starting points, not legal advice for your specific matter.
If your employer ignored accommodations or punished you for medical needs, act quickly. Document requests, calendar CRD deadlines, and speak with counsel before signing releases.