“At-will” employment does not mean every firing is lawful. When termination ties to discrimination, retaliation, or protected complaints, California employees may have remedies. KTL represents workers across Los Angeles County.
FEHA retaliation claims
Whistleblower pathways
Trial advocacy
In Brief
A California wrongful termination case typically alleges discharge or constructive discharge violated public policy or statutory protections such as FEHA anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation provisions, Labor Code whistleblower statutes, or narrow Tameny public-policy theories. At-will employment does not permit firing for unlawful reasons: retaliation after harassment complaints, wage protests, medical leave, or disability accommodation requests is commonly litigated in Los Angeles. Remedies may include lost wages, emotional distress, reinstatement in some matters, and punitive damages under stringent FEHA standards. Administrative exhaustion through the California Civil Rights Department (and EEOC for federal parallel claims) often is required before court for discrimination-related suits. Severance releases and arbitration agreements may affect forums and waived claims; review before signing.
Los Angeles workplaces combine at-will employment culture with strong statutory protections. Employers often label terminations as layoffs, performance failures, or mutual separations while emails and Slack threads show retaliation days after harassment complaints, wage protests, or medical leave requests. FEHA, Labor Code whistleblower provisions, and public-policy (Tameny) theories can coexist in one termination event.
Agency exhaustion through the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) and tight limitations clocks make procedure as important as merits. KTL reconstructs timelines, compares similarly situated employees, and prepares pretext arguments for trial when employers hide unlawful motive behind neutral paperwork.
$480,000 settlement on a retaliation and wrongful termination employment matter.
Mr. De Peralta, a chef, was terminated when he injured his knee outside of work.
Verdict plus Judgment awarding attorney’s fees on behalf of a low-wage garment worker who was terminated after reporting a work injury at a high end jeans company.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. The outcome of any case depends on the specific facts and applicable law. Verdicts and settlements listed represent the gross amount before fees, costs, and liens.
Reports of discrimination, harassment, or wage violations under Gov. Code §12940 and Labor Code anti-retaliation sections may support claims when timing and causation are shown.
Terminations following leave, accommodation requests, or interactive-process failures implicate FEHA disability theories.
Lab. Code §1102.5 and related statutes protect certain reports to government or supervisors about legal violations.
RIFs that disproportionately impact a protected class or follow complaints require comparator and statistical analysis.
Discharge after rejecting advances or reporting harassment; see Sexual Harassment.
Firing after demanding unpaid wages may violate Lab. Code §98.6; coordinate with Wage & Hour.
Back pay, front pay where appropriate, and value of lost health coverage and retirement contributions.
Anxiety, depression, and humiliation when termination follows harassment or discrimination.
Reputational damage, blacklisting fears, and difficulty replacing income in competitive LA job markets.
FEHA allows punitive damages when malice, oppression, or fraud is proved by clear and convincing evidence.
Unlawful discrimination, retaliation, and related termination theories under FEHA when elements are met.
Whistleblower and retaliation pathways (e.g., §1102.5, §98.6) are fact-specific.
Wrongful termination in violation of fundamental public policy may be recognized in narrow circumstances—judicial doctrine, not a single codified section.
Many FEHA claims require filing with CRD and obtaining a right-to-sue letter before court; federal parallel filing may be required for covered employers.
Corporations, nonprofits, and public agencies are primary defendants when unlawful motive or retaliation is proved.
Certain harassment and discrimination statutes permit individual liability; analyze with counsel before naming managers.
Host employers and agencies may both be liable when both control hiring and termination decisions.
Lost wages, benefits, and front pay when reinstatement is not feasible; mitigation efforts affect calculations.
FEHA and related statutes authorize non-economic damages when liability is established.
Available under FEHA when malice, oppression, or fraud is proved by clear and convincing evidence.
Prevailing plaintiffs may recover fees under FEHA in many matters; fee petitions are separate proceedings.
Reinstatement and policy changes are sometimes sought in addition to monetary remedies.
| Claim / context | Typical starting point |
|---|---|
| FEHA discrimination / retaliation | CRD filing deadlines (often one year from last act); right-to-sue triggers court limitations. |
| EEOC (federal) | 300 days for many charges when dual filing; verify with counsel. |
| Labor Code whistleblower | Statutes vary by section; calendar immediately after termination. |
| Public-policy (Tameny) | Often two years for many tort theories; confirm accrual. |
Insert firm-approved deadline chart after intake. Deadlines are fact-specific; this table is a planning aid, not legal advice.
Employers produce poor reviews after protected activity; temporal proximity and comparator employees rebut “at-will” narratives.
Employers argue they would have fired you anyway once new facts emerge; timing of discovery matters under McDonnell Douglas frameworks.
Individual claims may be compelled to arbitration while agency charges proceed; strategy differs from ordinary PI cases.
EPLI carriers control defense and settlement; mediation clauses and consent requirements affect timing.
Wage claims are typically uninsured; termination claims may still have EPLI when discrimination is alleged.
Settlement NDAs and Form 1099 treatment should be reviewed with counsel and tax advisors.
Termination may coincide with Wage & Hour or harassment claims requiring unified negotiation strategy.
“We try cases. That is what we are built for, and it is what makes our settlement offers higher than firms that won’t see the inside of a courtroom.”
Daniel Kramer, Founding Partner
Employment termination disputes in Los Angeles turn on timelines, personnel files, and whether an employer’s stated reason survives scrutiny under California’s wrongful termination, retaliation, and anti-discrimination frameworks. Readers benefit from counsel who can map agency pathways alongside civil strategy without losing sight of leverage, credibility, and confidentiality.

Founding Partner
Daniel Kramer is a trial lawyer who specializes in representing families and individuals involved in catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death matters, as well as employment discrimination and retaliation lawsuits.

Partner, Trial Lawyer
Teresa is a trial lawyer and partner at Kramer Trial Lawyers practicing in the areas of plaintiff’s personal injury, wrongful death and employment litigation.
California is generally considered an “at-will” employment state, which means employers can often terminate employees for many lawful reasons. However, employers cannot fire someone for an illegal reason. Wrongful termination may occur when an employee is fired because of discrimination, retaliation, whistleblowing, medical leave, disability, pregnancy, harassment complaints, wage disputes, or other protected activities under California law. Employees also may have claims if they were terminated in violation of an employment contract, public policy, or certain workplace protections.
Examples of wrongful termination can include firing an employee for reporting harassment or safety violations, requesting a reasonable accommodation, taking protected medical leave, refusing illegal conduct, filing a workers’ compensation claim, or reporting discrimination in the workplace. To prove a wrongful termination claim, it is often important to show that the termination was connected to unlawful conduct or retaliation rather than a legitimate business reason. Evidence may include emails, performance reviews, disciplinary records, witness statements, suspicious timing, inconsistent explanations from management, or evidence showing that company policies were not followed.
California employees generally must first file a complaint with the Civil Rights Department before pursuing certain wrongful termination claims involving discrimination or retaliation. Depending on the circumstances, remedies may include lost wages, future earnings, emotional distress damages, reinstatement, attorney’s fees, and other compensation allowed under California law.
If you believe you were wrongfully terminated, preserving evidence early can be extremely important.
Helpful evidence may include termination letters, emails, text messages, HR communications, performance reviews, disciplinary records, employee handbooks, contracts, schedules, pay records, and notes about workplace conversations or events leading up to your termination. It can also help to preserve evidence showing positive job performance, sudden changes in treatment, inconsistent discipline, or retaliation after reporting concerns or exercising workplace rights. For example, records showing that you were fired shortly after requesting medical leave, reporting harassment, complaining about unpaid wages, or raising safety concerns may become important evidence.
If coworkers witnessed relevant events or experienced similar treatment, their statements may also help support your claim.
If the termination caused emotional distress, financial hardship, or affected your health, medical or counseling records may also help document the impact the situation has had on your life. Whenever possible, keep copies of important evidence in a secure personal location rather than only on workplace devices or accounts.
Wrongful termination claims in California can involve important deadlines and legal procedures that vary depending on the type of claim involved. In many cases involving discrimination, harassment, or retaliation, employees must first file a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) before filing a lawsuit in court. Other claims — such as whistleblower violations, wage-and-hour disputes, or contract claims — may involve different agencies, deadlines, or procedures. Claims involving public employers, union agreements, arbitration clauses, or government entities may also involve additional legal requirements or shorter filing deadlines.
Because these deadlines can directly affect your rights, it is important to act quickly and preserve evidence as early as possible. Save communications, personnel records, pay records, performance reviews, and any documents related to your termination or workplace complaints. Speaking with an experienced employment attorney early in the process can help ensure deadlines are met and that the proper legal steps are taken to protect your rights.
If you were wrongfully terminated, you may be entitled to compensation for both your financial losses and the personal impact losing your job has had on your life. Depending on the circumstances, damages may include lost wages, lost benefits, future lost earnings, and compensation for emotional distress. Employees may also seek compensation for damage to their professional reputation, career opportunities, or long-term earning potential. In some cases, employees may request reinstatement to their former position. When an employer’s conduct is especially serious, intentional, or retaliatory, punitive damages may also be available under California law.
Evidence used to support damages may include employment records, pay records, tax documents, medical or mental health records, expert analysis regarding lost earning capacity, and evidence showing how the termination affected the employee’s finances and well-being. Every case is different, and the value of a wrongful termination claim depends on many factors, including the employee’s losses, the available evidence, and the long-term impact of the termination.
If you believe your termination may have been connected to discrimination, retaliation, harassment, wage complaints, medical leave, or other protected activity, it is important to preserve records and document concerns carefully. Whenever possible, keep copies of emails, performance reviews, disciplinary notices, HR complaints, schedules, pay records, and communications related to workplace concerns or your termination. If you raised complaints before being fired, preserve records showing when those complaints were made and how management responded.
It can also help to create a timeline of important events, including workplace complaints, accommodation requests, disciplinary actions, meetings with supervisors or HR, and the circumstances surrounding your termination. Avoid deleting messages, emails, or electronic records that may contain important evidence. If possible, store copies of documents in a secure personal location rather than relying only on company systems or devices. Careful documentation can help preserve important evidence, establish patterns of retaliation or unlawful conduct, and strengthen your ability to protect your rights if legal action becomes necessary.
These official resources are starting points, not legal advice for your specific matter.
If your firing followed complaints, leave, or discrimination, calendar CRD deadlines and preserve electronic records before access is cut off. Kramer Trial Lawyers can evaluate FEHA, retaliation, and public-policy theories in a consultation.