Car crashes on LA freeways and surface streets can cause injuries that ripple through work, family, and finances. KTL represents injured drivers and passengers across Los Angeles County and prepares cases for trial when insurers stall.
Trial-tested advocacy
Vehicle collision representation
LA County
In Brief
A California car crash case is typically a negligence lawsuit seeking damages when a driver’s unreasonable conduct causes a collision and injuries. Liability usually focuses on duties under the Vehicle Code, speed, distance, signals, and roadway conditions. Recoverable damages may include medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering where liability is proven. Deadlines depend on defendants; claims against public entities may require early administrative steps.
First 24 hours
Los Angeles County is built around the car. Daily life runs on the 405, 101, 110, and 5, plus surface streets that carry commuters, tourists, delivery fleets, and rideshare pickups at the same time. That mix produces rear-end chains on freeways, high-speed merges, red-light runners at wide intersections, and late-night impairment crashes when bars close in Hollywood, Downtown, and beach cities.
CHP collision reporting and statewide traffic safety data consistently show Los Angeles County among the highest-volume regions for injury crashes in California. NHTSA and federal safety research likewise treat urban congestion, distraction, and speed as persistent risk factors nationwide. Locally, Vision Zero and corridor-safety programs highlight streets where severe and fatal crashes concentrate, which often overlap with commuter routes through the Valley, South LA, and the Westside.
Insurance carriers serving this market commonly dispute liability using comparative fault themes and downplay injury severity when initial imaging looks normal. Prompt investigation preserves dashcam and doorbell video, business surveillance, event data recorder (“black box”) downloads when available, and witness statements before phones change and footage is overwritten. KTL represents injured drivers and passengers across Los Angeles County and prepares cases for trial when insurers stall or script lowball offers.
After years of fighting for justice, our client has received a $5.175 million jury verdict in Contra Costa County. She suffered permanent spinal injuries after being struck by a distracted driver in a Trader Joe’s parking lot in 2017.
After the insurance carrier offered just $250,000, we were forced to take this case to trial. Last week, the jury delivered a $1,975,000 verdict at the Santa Monica Courthouse.
Policy limits settlement short of trial on a rear end motor vehicle collision case with minimal property damage, resulting in non-surgical spine and orthopedic issues for our clients.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. The outcome of any case depends on the specific facts and applicable law. Verdicts and settlements listed represent the gross amount before fees, costs, and liens.
Drivers who exceed safe speed for traffic or follow at insufficient distance cause a large share of freeway rear-end collisions. Sudden stops in congestion on the 405 or 101 leave little margin for error. Violations of basic speed and following-distance duties under the Vehicle Code can support negligence or negligence-per-se theories when causation is proven.
Texting, apps, in-dash navigation, and handheld devices divert attention at merge points and intersections where reaction time matters most. California handheld-device restrictions exist because seconds of inattention produce lane departures and failure-to-yield crashes. Cell records and vehicle telematics sometimes document distraction when witnesses cannot.
Alcohol and drugs reduce judgment, reaction time, and lane control. Impaired driving cases may involve criminal proceedings separately from civil damages, and punitive damages theories are sometimes evaluated when statutory standards are met. Bars, events, and holiday weekends in LA corridors increase exposure.
Left turns across oncoming traffic and unprotected signals cause T-bone collisions with high injury severity. Drivers misjudge gap distance or fail to yield to vehicles with the right-of-way. Intersection cameras and witness sight lines often decide these disputes.
Rolling stops and signal violations produce broadside impacts at urban intersections. LAPD reporting and independent witnesses help when both drivers give conflicting accounts.
Long commutes, shift work, and drowsy driving contribute to lane drift and fixed-object collisions. Fatigue is harder to prove than alcohol but medical records, work schedules, and crash timing can support the narrative.
Rain and smoke reduce traction and visibility on LA freeways and canyon roads. Drivers still must adjust speed and following distance to conditions; “weather” rarely excuses negligence by itself.
Rear-end and side impacts whip the neck through rapid flexion-extension, producing disc injuries, radiculopathy, and chronic pain even at moderate speeds. Early imaging may look normal while symptoms persist.
Head strikes on windows, steering wheels, or deployed airbags can cause concussion or moderate TBI. Cognitive fog, headaches, and sleep disruption may emerge after an unremarkable emergency visit. See Brain Injury for TBI-focused claims.
Disc herniations and vertebral injuries can require injections, surgery, or long-term limitations. Severe cord involvement may qualify as catastrophic harm. See Spinal Injury when paralysis or surgical fusion is in play.
Ribs, wrists, ankles, and facial bones break in side impacts and airbag deployments. Open fractures and surgical hardware increase future care needs.
Anxiety, driving phobia, and PTSD symptoms are common after serious collisions, especially when occupants feared for their lives. Treatment records support non-economic damages when linked to the crash.
Speed, turns, signals, right-of-way, DUI, and equipment rules define how drivers must behave on LA freeways and surface streets. Proven violations can support negligence per se or strong circumstantial evidence of breach when linked to the collision mechanism.
Everyone is responsible for injuries caused by lack of ordinary care. Auto cases still require duty, breach, causation, and damages, but Vehicle Code duties often frame what “reasonable care” meant at the intersection or merge where the crash occurred.
Many negligence personal injury claims must be filed within two years of accrual. Property-damage-only claims may follow different periods. Calendar early and evaluate tolling with counsel.
Claims against public entities for dangerous roadways, traffic signal timing, or municipal vehicles often require an administrative claim within six months before suit. Missing the window can bar recovery regardless of injury severity.
When an uninsured plaintiff sues another motorist, non-economic damages may be limited in many circumstances. Insurance status interacts with recovery categories; verify how your status affects pain-and-suffering exposure before settling.
The at-fault operator is the primary defendant in most crash cases. Auto liability policies respond when coverage exists and exclusions do not apply.
Owners who allow others to drive their vehicles may be liable when statutory and factual elements are met, even if they were not in the car.
Employees acting within the scope of employment may expose employers to respondeat superior liability. Delivery fleets, contractors, and company cars often carry commercial policies with higher limits than personal minimums.
Uber, Lyft, and similar services layer coverage by trip period. See Uber & Lyft when app status and insurer denials are in dispute.
Tractor-trailers and commercial carriers involve federal safety rules and layered policies. See Trucking Crashes for FMCSR and carrier documentation issues.
Dangerous roadway design, signal timing, or maintenance failures may implicate public entities if timely government claims are presented and immunity defenses are overcome.
Past and future medical expenses, rehabilitation, prescriptions, mileage to treatment, lost wages, and diminished earning capacity when supported by records and experts.
Pain and suffering, emotional distress, scarring, and loss of enjoyment of life where liability and proof support these categories. Proposition 213 may limit non-economic recovery for uninsured plaintiffs suing other drivers in many settings.
Vehicle repair or total-loss value, rental cars, and personal property in the vehicle. Property claims sometimes proceed on a faster track than injury components.
Civ. Code §3294 allows exemplary damages only when malice, oppression, or fraud is proven by clear and convincing evidence. DUI, hit-and-run, or conscious disregard theories are evaluated case by case, not assumed.
California’s statutes of limitations are strict. Missing one is almost always fatal to a case, no matter how strong the underlying facts.
| Claim | Typical starting point |
|---|---|
| Injury vs. private party | Often two years under CCP §335.1 for many negligence claims; confirm accrual and tolling. |
| Property damage only | Different limitations may apply when only property is damaged; calendar separately. |
| Government tort claims | Short presentation windows under the Government Claims Act; evaluate Gov. Code §911.2 early. |
| UM / UIM contractual claims | Policy notice and contractual deadlines can be shorter than tort SOLs; review declarations and endorsements. |
Insert firm-approved deadline chart after intake. Deadlines are fact-specific; this table is a planning aid, not legal advice.
Pure comparative negligence
California follows pure comparative fault: your recovery is reduced by your percentage of responsibility but is not automatically barred because you share fault. Insurers often assign exaggerated percentages based on speculation about speed, lane changes, or distraction.
Negligence requires duty, breach, causation, and damages. Breach may be shown through Vehicle Code violations, following too closely, failure to yield, or impairment evidence tied to the crash mechanism. Scene measurements, EDR data, and reconstruction help when stories conflict.
Carriers script comparative fault early in recorded statements. Objective proof such as traffic video, independent witnesses, and medical timing can rebut generic “you should have seen it” themes common in Los Angeles intersection disputes.
UM and UIM coverage
Uninsured and underinsured motorist provisions on your auto policy may apply when the at-fault driver has no insurance or inadequate limits. Notice, arbitration clauses, and anti-stacking language require careful review before you waive rights.
Stacking, resident-relative rules, and excess umbrellas can change available limits when several household vehicles carry coverage.
App-on versus app-off periods change which carrier responds. Coordinate with Uber & Lyft analysis when TNC denials cite “personal use only.”
MedPay can fund early treatment but may coordinate with health plans. Medicare, Medi-Cal, and ERISA liens affect net settlement; resolve liens before disbursement.
Minimum-limit policies are common in LA County. Investigate employer, umbrella, and additional insured endorsements when harms exceed primary limits.
“We try cases. That is what we are built for, and it is what makes our settlement offers higher than firms that won’t see the inside of a courtroom.”
Daniel Kramer, Founding Partner

Founding Partner
Daniel Kramer is a trial lawyer who specializes in representing families and individuals involved in catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death matters, as well as employment discrimination and retaliation lawsuits.

Partner, Trial Lawyer
Teresa is a trial lawyer and partner at Kramer Trial Lawyers practicing in the areas of plaintiff’s personal injury, wrongful death and employment litigation.

Trial Lawyer
David is a trial lawyer practicing in the areas of plaintiff’s medical malpractice, catastrophic personal injury, and wrongful death.
After a car crash, your first priority should be your health and safety. Call 911 and seek medical attention, even if your injuries seem minor at first. If you are able, take photos of the scene, vehicle damage, road conditions, weather, and any hazards. Gather contact information for witnesses and ask nearby businesses to preserve surveillance footage before it is erased. Be sure to keep damaged items such as a helmet, shoes, or vehicle parts.
Notify your insurance company as soon as possible and open all available coverages, including liability, Medical Payments, and UM/UIM coverage. It is usually best to avoid giving a recorded statement to the other driver’s insurance company until the facts are clear and you understand the full extent of your injuries and treatment. Keep track of your injuries, medical visits, expenses, lost wages, and any visible changes such as bruising or swelling. California’s increased minimum auto liability limits may also affect available coverage and settlement options in serious cases. An experienced attorney can help you protect your rights, navigate the claims process, and pursue the compensation you deserve.
Liability is proven by gathering evidence that helps explain how the crash happened and who was at fault. Helpful evidence can include photos and videos from the scene, police reports, witness statements, and measurements or damage patterns. In some cases, digital evidence, such as vehicle data, 911 recordings, or cell phone records, can also help show important details like speed, braking, distraction, or whether a vehicle was properly maintained.
Depending on the circumstances of your case, you may be able to recover compensation for both financial losses and the personal impact the injuries have had on your life. This can include medical expenses, lost income, reduced earning ability, transportation costs, household assistance, and the cost of modifying a home or vehicle after a serious injury.
You may also recover damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and the ways the injuries have affected your daily life, relationships, and ability to enjoy activities you once could. There is no single formula for calculating the value of a case. Every situation is different, and a fair settlement or verdict should take into account the full extent of your losses both now and in the future.
Every car crash case is different, so the timeline can vary widely. Some claims are resolved through insurance negotiations before a lawsuit is filed, while others require litigation and may ultimately be decided through settlement or trial. Factors such as the severity of the injuries, ongoing medical treatment, disputes about fault, and court scheduling can all affect how long a case takes.
In California, the deadline to file a lawsuit is generally two years from the date of the crash, but shorter deadlines may apply in certain situations—especially if a government agency or public entity is involved. Different rules can also apply for minors and other special circumstances.
Because important deadlines can affect your rights, it is a good idea to speak with an attorney early in the process. An experienced lawyer can help guide you through the claims process, protect key evidence, and make sure all filing deadlines are met.
Insurance coverage can play a major role in the outcome of a car crash case. Important issues often include how much insurance coverage is available, whether multiple policies may apply, and whether the at-fault driver has enough coverage to fully compensate for the injuries and losses involved. In addition to the other driver’s liability coverage, your own policy may provide important benefits through Medical Payments coverage or Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM) coverage. These coverages can help pay for medical expenses or provide compensation when the at-fault driver has little or no insurance. If the at-fault driver was working at the time of the incident, there could be additional coverage through their employer.
Coverage disputes can also arise over policy limits, exclusions, comparative fault, rideshare use, commercial vehicles, or whether additional parties may share responsibility for the crash. Because insurance companies often work to minimize damages, it is important to understand all available sources of coverage. An experienced attorney can help identify available insurance policies, navigate coverage issues, and work to maximize the compensation available for your claim.
These official resources are starting points, not legal advice for your specific matter.
If you were hurt in a collision, protect evidence, calendar deadlines, and understand coverage before you sign releases. Kramer Trial Lawyers can evaluate fault, damages, and insurer tactics in a consultation.